BJP president Rajnath Singh on Monday refused to accept veteran leader L.K. Advani's resignation from various posts in the party. Minutes after Advani handed over his resignation to Rajnath, the latter replied to his resignation letter stating that he was rejecting it.
Apparently upset over the elevation of his one-time protege - Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi - as election campaign committee chief, the 85-year-old founder member of the BJP resigned from the Parliamentary Board, National Executive and the Election Committee.
Advani, however, stated that he would continued to be a primary member of the party. He also retained the post of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) chairman.
Meanwhile, some top party leaders, including Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj, were planning to meet Advani to pacify him and urge him to continue with the party posts. Earlier in the day, the BJP chief visited the party patriarch at the latterâ??s residence. In his hour-long meeting, Rajnath failed to convince Advani.
Senior BJP leader L.K. Advani resigned from all posts he held in the party including from the National Executive, the parliamentary board and the election committee. He will continue to remain a primary member of the party.
In his resignation, he said, "I am finding it difficult to reconcile either with the current functioning of the party, or the direction in which it is going. I no longer have the feeling that this is the same idealistic party created by Dr Mookerji, Deen Dayalji, Nanaji and Vajpayeeji whose sole concern was the country and its people. Most leaders of ours are now concerned just with their personal agendas."
The pointed reference was to the elevation of Gujarat CM Narendra Modi at the Goa National Executive that concluded on Saturday. The rank and file of the party had sought the Modi elevation. The senior leader had not made it to Goa which analysts had attributed to his unhappiness at the imminent anointing of Modi.
Ahead of the National Executive, Goa CM Manohar Parrikar had signaled for Advani to give up his opposition to Modi. In an interview, Parrikar had said politicians aged above 65 should introspect if they should retire. He said leaders aged more than 65 lose firm decision-making abilities. A few weeks ago, the party had expelled senior advocate Ram Jethmalani for six years. Jethmalani had time and again wanted the party to declare Modi as its prime ministerial nominee.
Leaders of the National Democratic Alliance, the BJP-led alliance, are likely to be induced by Advani's decision to quit party posts. Janata Dal-United leader Sharad Yadav hinted that the party will have to rethink on its continuance in the NDA.
It remains to be seen how Advani camp leaders react.
The wreckage of Wednesday gave little cheer to both the winner and the vanquished. In Karnataka, the only surprise was the magnitude of BJP's humiliation in a state that once offered the party a historic gateway to the south. In Delhi, Congress was denied the pleasure of celebrating its landslide in Karnataka as the Supreme Court unravelled the lies of the beleaguered Law Minister Ashwani Kumar in the multi-crore coal allocation scam, further making the Prime Minister's defence untenable. Taken together, Bangalore and Delhi, in the span of one bittersweet day, told the sordid saga of the moribund BJP and the discredited UPA.
The Indian right, which has been fighting its inner demons ever since its fall from power in 2004, doesn't have the mind or the muscle to make use of the Congress's worst moment. What it has in abundance is a galaxy of national-some even notional-leaders whose ego is larger than their popular base, and whose ambition is incompatible with their achievement. At a time when an India, disillusioned with a corrupt ruling regime, craves for a credible and cohesive alternative, BJP, the erstwhile party with a difference, is far from struggling for power. It is irredeemably steeped in a power struggle within.
If BJP can still claim to be a party with a difference, it is for all the wrong reasons. The House of Saffron has no one Leader, but an embarrassment of leaders. The party president, a heartland warhorse, has not yet shown that he can lead from the front. He has not yet come out with an idea-or a slogan-that can inspire the base and unsettle the opponents. His seniority, or even respectability, is strictly defined by his designation, not his personality. The others are more visible and audible. Arun Jaitley, leader of opposition in the Rajya Sabha, is a fine parliamentarian whose argumentative powers can put the treasury benches on the defensive.
But he is more at home in the backrooms rather than in the heat and dust of mass politics. Sushma Swaraj, leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, is a lady with a common touch, and a shrill but effective public speaker. L.K. Advani, patriarch of the Parivar and a venerable parliamentarian, is in sagely isolation, known more for his unhappiness than wisdom. Hovering above them all is Narendra Modi, the party's bestselling brand; Moditva, a heady mix of development and nationalism, has already outgrown Hindutva.
In an ideal situation, they could be the Fabulous Five. Their collective talent-varying from organisational acumen to strategic thinking to good governance-could be an internal asset and the opponent's envy. But they are fast proving to be the fatal five for the party's future as General Elections loom. They are united only by ambition, which itself is not a bad thing in politics. In BJP, however, a prerequisite for the realisation of each one's ambition is the other's fall.
One man has already stolen a march over the others: Modi has not only become the first among equals but his campaign for India has become a political force rarely seen before in the country. He is determined to make himself inevitable to the party, if not India. The party is still struggling to come to terms with him. The one leader most unsettled by the rise of Modi is Advani, the man who worked most, and walked long, to bring bjp to power. But he served those five years as Number Two to Atal Bihari Vajpayee. At 85, he badly wants to be Number One, once in his lifetime. It is not a sentiment shared by his former proteges, for that is what they, too, want to be.
Clash of Egos
From the diarchy of Vajpayee-Advani, the party is now caught between the warring aspirations of these five stars. Advani, Jaitley, Sushma and Rajnath know the party cadre want Modi as captain but they would like to delay that as much as possible or at least keep his proposed elevation as chairman of the campaign committee as vaguely defined as possible. They would like to benefit from his popular appeal but not submit themselves to what they fear will be his ruthless, take-no-prisoners style of functioning.
Sushma and Jaitley, both of whom Advani has mentored for over two decades, are pursuing their own ambitions. While Sushma still gives due respect to Advani, she is trying to inch closer to rss. "It is something that hurts Advaniji but he understands that she has her future to think of," a source close to Advani claims. However, Advani cannot forgive the "betrayal" of Jaitley, who has openly seconded himself to Modi. Jaitley believes Advani has always played favourites where Sushma is concerned. Advani preferred to propose Sushma's name for bjp president when the party was deciding on Nitin Gadkari's successor. The party patriarch was miffed that Jaitley went to rss leader Suresh Soni for an endorsement for the post of party president.
There is just too much distrust. The usually media-friendly Jaitley is maintaining an uncharacteristically low profile. He has kept himself busy travelling to Karnataka over weekends as election in-charge. It's been a month since he attended meetings of the party's core group-comprising Sushma, Rajnath, Gadkari and rss pointman Ram Lal-which takes all key decisions in the party, and has been meeting at Advani's house. There is speculation that if it comes to the crunch and Modi's lack of acceptability becomes an issue, he may well propose Jaitley's name as prime ministerial candidate. After all, Jaitley has a good equation with Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and also with Biju Janata Dal leader Naveen Patnaik. RSS may not be thrilled but will probably agree to Jaitley if left with no other choice.
Sushma, too, is quietly strengthening her base. Sources reveal that in the past few weeks, she has been in touch with Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray and Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee. Uddhav, during a Shiv Sena party meeting on May 1, said that BJP should consult allies before announcing the prime ministerial candidate. He reminded the party that his father late Balasaheb Thackeray had endorsed Sushma's name as ideal PM material. She has a natural affinity with Janata Dal (United), a crucial nda ally. Sushma is often seen bonding with nda convener and former fellow socialist Sharad Yadav in the Central Hall of Parliament. She has consciously played on the right side of RSS on all issues. When rss was pushing for a second term for Gadkari, she kept a calculated middle-of-the-road stance. Sushma was trying to ensure that in a crunch, she will emerge as a "safe" option for prime ministerial candidate.
Call of Nagpur
The problem is that even Rajnath is positioning himself as a safe bet. He became party president only after the other leaders were ruled out of the race. The fact that rss is extremely well-disposed towards him only helped his cause. Rajnath hopes that the same stroke of luck that made him party president will again help him in the run-up to the 2014 polls. He is aiming much higher now, eyeing the prime minister's seat-daring to position himself as the next Vajpayee. Or at least that is what his spin doctors have been trying to project since he took over as BJP president in January. "He comes from the Hindi heartland (Uttar Pradesh) like Vajpayee and his command over the language, coupled with his oratorical skills, are just like Vajpayee's," says a close aide.
In fact, newly appointed General Secretary Varun Gandhi probably took a cue from that when he compared Rajnath with Vajpayee at an election rally in Bareilly on May 1. For the time being, Rajnath is projecting Varun as the face of Uttar Pradesh elections. The mutual admiration society of Rajnath and Varun also reflects the party's dilemma on Hindutva. BJP has still not been able to take a decisive stand on whether it stands for Hindutva or governance tempered with nationalism.
Rajnath knows it is best to allow the Modi juggernaut to roll on. Internal surveys from Uttar Pradesh indicate that if Modi is fielded as the party nominee for prime minister, he will add a 12 per cent vote to the party share of 22 per cent. But like others, Rajnath is wary of the Gujarat Chief Minister's single-minded pursuit of his dream of "repaying his debt to the Motherland". The largely unmentioned political reality of Gujarat is that Modi has ensured there are no leaders anywhere near as tall as him in BJP. The Sangh Parivar is wary of him because he has systematically reduced RSS presence in his state. He got rid of RSS man Sanjay Joshi from Gujarat and virtually declared VHP leader Praveen Togadia persona non grata. RSS abhors his autocratic style but has also reluctantly realised that BJP's best chance at forming a government is if Narendra Modi is the NDA's prime ministerial candidate.
The only person that RSS is completely averse to is Advani. He may not be pushing for his candidature actively but he definitely wants to be in a position where he will have a say in the matter. Instead of playing a constructive role, befitting his status as builder of the party, he has painted himself as a martyr, a victim deprived of his rightful status. He pushes Sushma's name when he wants to put down Jaitley. He endorses the name of Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan when he wants to belittle Modi's achievements. "A leader of his stature should be a unifying force instead of a divisive one," says an RSS leader.
For Advani, it has been a perpetual tussle with RSS. Once a Hindutva icon, Advani lost favour with RSS when he praised Mohammad Ali Jinnah during his visit to Pakistan as BJP president in 2005. He was forced to quit and RSS chose Rajnath to succeed him. That was the turning point in RSS's relationship with BJP as it took to micromanaging the party affairs. RSS has made deeper inroads into the party by increasing its representatives in the central party from one to six, working as 'sangathan mantris'.
RSS has made a lateral entry into the party, down to the level of districts and mandals. After Rajnath's term ended, RSS replaced him with Gadkari, their other blue-eyed boy. BJP lost considerable moral ground in its fight against corruption with RSS insisting on giving a second term to Gadkari despite his Purti group of companies being charged with financial malpractices. It took a mini rebellion in the party led by Advani and income tax raids on Gadkari's companies to make RSS relent, with senior leader Yashwant Sinha even threatening to contest against Gadkari for BJP president.
Strategic Blunders
However, RSS still managed to undercut Advani as it succeeded in deputing Rajnath as party president again. The Sangh continues to manage BJP through Rajnath and its sangathan mantris. In fact, some of the RSS men like Prabhat Jha and Om Mathur have been sent to the Rajya Sabha. "RSS is in the process of making a shift from being a nationalist organisation, working in the background, to an actively political one. It is a disturbing trend," cautions a BJP leader. Even as the senior party leaders continue to squabble, it will be left to RSS to take a final call on the party's PM candidate.
RSS leaders prefer confabulations to undercut one another rather than sitting together and working out a strategy to defeat UPA. "BJP seems to think that UPA is going to defeat itself and the next government at the Centre is up for grabs. They are in for a rude shock if they go into the next Lok Sabha elections unprepared and squabbling," says a party leader. As of now, the party has shown no signs of putting its house in order. Even in Parliament, they are seen as being purely obstructionist. "It is fine to stall bills and disrupt parliamentary politics but then they have to specify what they are offering to people. The party is on the verge of losing the goodwill of the middle class, its natural constituency," adds the leader. There is no cohesion and no plan in place"
It's the Economy, Stupid!
In their preoccupation with gaining power, BJP seems to have given policy formulation a complete miss. Its economic agenda is plagued by incoherence. When in government at the Centre between 1998 and 2004, the party was a fervent supporter of tough economic reforms. It was the Vajpayee-led NDA government that had originally proposed drastic measures like allowing 100 per cent foreign investment in multi-brand retail. A decade on, the central leadership opportunistically opposed FDI in retail in September 2012 in direct confrontation with the approach of some of their own chief ministers like Narendra Modi who have actively courted FDI across sectors. The central leadership is now opposing raising the FDI limit in insurance, a policy BJP had always supported.
The party's dogmatic approach to economic policy makes it impossible to distinguish it from the Congress, which is instinctively anti-reform, at a time voters are looking for an alternative reformist economic agenda. It was the NDA Government under Vajpayee that first set up a Ministry for Disinvestment in 1999. The UPA later lowered its status to a department within the ministry of finance in 2004. But under the NDA, the disinvestment ministry, headed by Arun Shourie between 2000 and 2004, was very proactive. It carried out several high-profile disinvestments, most famously freeing Maruti Suzuki, India's largest car-maker from Government control. It is unfortunate that the BJP no longer sees it fit to even consult Shourie on matters related to economic policy.
As an analyst puts it, BJP has done very little outside of the Hindutva to build a narrative, "If you are positioning yourself as a party with a difference, then be different. Construct a New BJP, just as Tony Blair built a New Labour," he says. Yet, whenever it is in desperation, BJP waves the Hindutva flag, not realising the simple truth that India has already gone beyond Ayodhya and what the party needs is not the redundant ideology of religious nationalism but ideas-ideas of change. It has to strike a balance between the twin poles of Hindutva that pleases RSS and governance that appeals to its natural constituency: Urban, aspirational India.
But engrossed in fighting one another, the party has paid little attention to strategy, and at great cost. This was best exemplified in the Karnataka loss. The party dilly-dallied in taking action against scam-tainted B.S. Yeddyurappa for too long. Advani wanted to take the moral high ground by asking him to resign as chief minister. Then party president Gadkari favoured a more practical approach and stood by Yeddyurappa, who had led the party to its sole decisive victory in a south Indian state in 2008. Modi and Jaitley preferred a more nuanced approach. Sushma was sympathetic to Yeddyurappa due to her proximity to brothers Gali Janardhana Reddy and Somasekhara Reddy, who had helped her when she contested from Bellary against Sonia Gandhi in 1999.
It was only after then Lokayukta N. Santosh Hegde indicted the Reddy brothers, who were part of the state Cabinet, and Yeddyurappa in his report on illegal mining in July 2011, that they all had to resign. Poor political management, not so much bad governance, brought bjp's house down in Karnataka. Just as it had done Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand. In Uttarakhand, the central leadership dithered in bringing back B.C. Khanduri, and when they finally took the decision less than six months before the elections in March 2012, it was too late for him to save the party in the state. As for Himachal, Jaitley had admitted after the results in 2012 that "the rebellion in the party" was perhaps a factor in BJP's defeat.
It is ironic that for a party that is bumbling at the Centre, it still leads some of the better governed states in the country including Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat and Goa, and is an alliance partner in Punjab and Bihar. BJP has emerged as a party of quality governance in these states. Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Raman Singh's food security bill was the model for Sonia Gandhi's Food Security Act that the Congress is trying to push in Parliament. Madhya Pradesh achieved a growth rate of 15 per cent in agriculture for 2012-13, toppling Bihar from the top spot. Modi has shown the way in employment generation and industrialisation in Gujarat. Goa Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar adopted several innovative ideas to curb illegal mining and to earn revenue.
Yet this equity has not helped the BJP at the Centre. On the contrary, state satraps like Chouhan are showing all signs of joining the race for the post of prime minister. Party spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman says so many leaders is reflective of a robust democracy in the party. She also denies that the party leaders have failed to get their act together. "It has become fashionable to say BJP has failed to rise to the occasion with UPA in a mess. There is still time. We'll announce our PM candidate when the time comes," she says.
What the party now needs is a leader with ideas that can reclaim the still vacant space for a modern right-wing party. It has to tap the economic and cultural aspirations of twenty-first century India. As the 2014 General Elections loom, can the BJP afford a hattrick in defeat?
No comments:
Post a Comment