Showing posts sorted by relevance for query analysis. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query analysis. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, February 09, 2009

Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy

By Jamshed Iqbal

One comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”.

However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this “subtle subversion” that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of “scholars” of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an “all-purpose unit” to bring my point home.

A wise man may have some knowledge but “it does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wise”. For knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole.

Men of knowledge without wisdom are far more harmful for human family than mad men. For knowledge without wisdom lacks comprehensiveness of vision, feelings, beauty and empathy. Therefore it is not beneficial at all, and in religious terms, it is irreligious! How?

A man of knowledge studies the composition of the atom from a disinterested desire for knowledge, and incidentally places it in the hands of powerful lunatics as the means of destroying the human race.

In such ways the pursuit of knowledge may become harmful unless it is combined with wisdom; and wisdom in the sense of comprehensive vision is not necessarily present in specialists in the pursuit of any kind of knowledge.

The point is “so-called men of knowledge lack comprehensive vision that is necessary to make them wise”. Ask, for example, a man of science to define human being! If he is sociologist he will tell you that, “man is a social animal for he cannot live without society”. Ask the same question to a physicist and he would brief you about “material composition of a human being” and reduce it to material hump. Raise this question before a chemist and get ready to listen that “man is nothing but product or composition of different chemicals”. A chemist would also open your eyes by telling that “man is a chemical animal and his emotions and character is mainly controlled by chemical balance or imbalance”. Go to a biologist to listen, “human being is an organism composed of different organs”. See a human being have been dissected into piece and lost! Even if all of these definitions cannot include what makes a human being a human being!

Definitions, I mean to say, are the foundations of analytical thinking and they always fail to spot the core—the essence. For example, in above definition of human person, what makes human person a human person is nowhere, as no definition could be holistic! Moreover, in definition, metaphor or simile, as logic demands, is not allowed to make analytical thinking free from feelings but religious wisdom or morality is absurd or impossible without feelings! There is no room for aesthetics (beauty) in analysis and morality or wisdom gushes from these two springs as well!
I think Islam is very clear about this point as:

“Allah is beautiful and loves beauty”. Allah (The Supreme Reality) is truth and truth cannot be revealed unto those whose whole effort is demystification and dissection!

Has analysis anything to do with “love”? Isn’t beauty a mystery so beyond the logic (Allah Him/Herself)? Have analytical sciences, from so-called Enlightenment Age onwards, not been trying to demystify the mysterious phenomenon of existence or being? Was it not an organized effort to obliterate God from human consciousness? Has sciences (knowledge not wisdom) not been consciously trying to omit suggestiveness from natural phenomena to make it dull and ugly!

There have a tendency among Quranic scholars—the tendency to count! For example word (or Ism-e-Zat) Allah has been used so many times in Quran. Mr. Zakir Naik, and others of course, can safely claim 10 GB memory containing these types of calculations. But, so far as I know, no one has told that how many similes and metaphors are used in Quran. How many attributes of Allah (the beneficent the merciful) reflect rationality and others feelings or emotions?

Mr. Zakir Naik could not deny that Prophet Mohammad’s (May peace by upon him) holy life is an evergreen epic of compassion and empathy—the gift “to feel” with others! Remember once my Lord was running for milking the sheep to feed a crying cat when West was not familiar with “animal rights”! Was it analysis or feeling—feeling with and for the whole creation?

Islam is known to be the highest point of Abrahamic tradition and Prophet Abraham dived into the fire! A rationalist or an analyst (or a man of knowledge) would never think that fire could behave otherwise!

In short the whole range of knowledge mounted up by sciences is of analytical nature, and therefore today, world is rich with knowledge but poor in wisdom. For if it were rich in wisdom we would have been living in paradise! The main problem with our age is that our age far surpasses all previous ages in knowledge (rotted data) but there is a correlative “famine” of wisdom. Since wisdom includes not only intellect but also feelings, and this world is mostly steered by those whose knowledge is wide but feelings are too narrow! Therefore they have made it a hell of hatred!

One of my brothers, Mr. Wasif, wrote about Zakir Naik’s comments about Sufi saints. According to him Zakir Naik says:
“Sufism is an alien plant in the soil of Islam”

These are actually the words of Allama Mohammad Iqbal (1877-1938) who, no doubt, was an extraordinarily profound and inspiring poet—but as a philosopher, he used to wear several hats of intellect like Herbert Spencer in Western philosophical tradition. Actually, as I think, his poetry and thought begins in trivial metaphors, pretty metaphors, then culminates into “grace metaphors” and finally goes on to profoundest thinking that we have. Mr. Zakir Naik should note that in his profundity—Iqbal himself is a Sufi! For example:

Ik Danish-e-burhani, ik Danish-e-ruhani
Hai Danish-e-burhani hairat ki frawani
(One the one hand there is an argumentative/logical wisdom, and, on the other hand spiritual wisdom! But argumentative/logical wisdom is nothing but surplus of wonder…….)

Qadhe khirad froze keh Frang dad mara
Hama aftab lekin asar-e-sahar na darid
(The shining wine cup of rationality offered by the West is the full Sun but powerless/impotent to bring into being lime light of the morning)

Iqbal used to call himself a disciple (mureed hindi) of Jalal-ud-Din Rumi—the great Persian Sufi poet! Therefore, he was highly impressed by Persian influence on Islamic culture, community and thought. For example, in his famous chapter, The Muslim Community, in The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam, Iqbal writes:
“The conquest of Persia gave to the Musalmans what the conquest of Greece gave to the Romans. But for Persian, our culture would have been absolutely one sided”.

It is doubtless that Mr. Zakir Naik is advocating and pushing exclusively soulless, fanatical and chauvinistic Saudi (Wahhabi) version of Islam that has become a disgusting scar on the face of highly inclusive Islamic teachings! It is duty of Wahabism to wage war against teachings of great Sufi saints who kept the divinely prophet-consciousness alive not by preaching the truth but living like truth! Naik’s grudge towards Hussain (may Allah be pleased with him) is a clear sign that he is an agent of un-Islamic Saudi state employed to save her from Hussain who exposes and challenges Yazid of every age!

Wahhabism is troubled by Sufism for it is a message of inclusiveness and tolerance! Wahhabism wages war against it for it is a message of freedom and core of Islam that is, in its essence anti- hierarchy and anti-establishment! Wahhabism is afraid of Sufism for it shows a beautiful face of Islam but Saudi’s allies (especially United States) are funding her to prove it ugly and dangerous for peaceful coexistence!
Mr. Zakir Naik and all his friends are stakeholders in the highly lucrative and hideous business of a great conspiracy “Defame & Destroy”. For it is duty of Wahhabism to promote blameful and reproachably bigoted religiosity for facilitating its funders to wipe Muslims from the face of the earth by declaring them potentially dangerous creatures!

May Allah save my innocent brothers and sisters in Islam from felling a prey to a vicious alliance! May Allah help us to show our non-Muslim brothers and sisters that Wahhabism is not the real face of Islam! Islam is one of the most inclusive religions wherein “ink of a scholar is holier than blood of a martyr” and “killing one human person is killing humanity”! Islam—that is a religion of heart, love, empathy and compassion!
Amen!

Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy

By Jamshed Iqbal

One comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”.

However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this “subtle subversion” that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of “scholars” of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an “all-purpose unit” to bring my point home.

A wise man may have some knowledge but “it does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wise”. For knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole.

Men of knowledge without wisdom are far more harmful for human family than mad men. For knowledge without wisdom lacks comprehensiveness of vision, feelings, beauty and empathy. Therefore it is not beneficial at all, and in religious terms, it is irreligious! How?

A man of knowledge studies the composition of the atom from a disinterested desire for knowledge, and incidentally places it in the hands of powerful lunatics as the means of destroying the human race.

In such ways the pursuit of knowledge may become harmful unless it is combined with wisdom; and wisdom in the sense of comprehensive vision is not necessarily present in specialists in the pursuit of any kind of knowledge.

The point is “so-called men of knowledge lack comprehensive vision that is necessary to make them wise”. Ask, for example, a man of science to define human being! If he is sociologist he will tell you that, “man is a social animal for he cannot live without society”. Ask the same question to a physicist and he would brief you about “material composition of a human being” and reduce it to material hump. Raise this question before a chemist and get ready to listen that “man is nothing but product or composition of different chemicals”. A chemist would also open your eyes by telling that “man is a chemical animal and his emotions and character is mainly controlled by chemical balance or imbalance”. Go to a biologist to listen, “human being is an organism composed of different organs”. See a human being have been dissected into piece and lost! Even if all of these definitions cannot include what makes a human being a human being!

Definitions, I mean to say, are the foundations of analytical thinking and they always fail to spot the core—the essence. For example, in above definition of human person, what makes human person a human person is nowhere, as no definition could be holistic! Moreover, in definition, metaphor or simile, as logic demands, is not allowed to make analytical thinking free from feelings but religious wisdom or morality is absurd or impossible without feelings! There is no room for aesthetics (beauty) in analysis and morality or wisdom gushes from these two springs as well!
I think Islam is very clear about this point as:

“Allah is beautiful and loves beauty”. Allah (The Supreme Reality) is truth and truth cannot be revealed unto those whose whole effort is demystification and dissection!

Has analysis anything to do with “love”? Isn’t beauty a mystery so beyond the logic (Allah Him/Herself)? Have analytical sciences, from so-called Enlightenment Age onwards, not been trying to demystify the mysterious phenomenon of existence or being? Was it not an organized effort to obliterate God from human consciousness? Has sciences (knowledge not wisdom) not been consciously trying to omit suggestiveness from natural phenomena to make it dull and ugly!

There have a tendency among Quranic scholars—the tendency to count! For example word (or Ism-e-Zat) Allah has been used so many times in Quran. Mr. Zakir Naik, and others of course, can safely claim 10 GB memory containing these types of calculations. But, so far as I know, no one has told that how many similes and metaphors are used in Quran. How many attributes of Allah (the beneficent the merciful) reflect rationality and others feelings or emotions?

Mr. Zakir Naik could not deny that Prophet Mohammad’s (May peace by upon him) holy life is an evergreen epic of compassion and empathy—the gift “to feel” with others! Remember once my Lord was running for milking the sheep to feed a crying cat when West was not familiar with “animal rights”! Was it analysis or feeling—feeling with and for the whole creation?

Islam is known to be the highest point of Abrahamic tradition and Prophet Abraham dived into the fire! A rationalist or an analyst (or a man of knowledge) would never think that fire could behave otherwise!

In short the whole range of knowledge mounted up by sciences is of analytical nature, and therefore today, world is rich with knowledge but poor in wisdom. For if it were rich in wisdom we would have been living in paradise! The main problem with our age is that our age far surpasses all previous ages in knowledge (rotted data) but there is a correlative “famine” of wisdom. Since wisdom includes not only intellect but also feelings, and this world is mostly steered by those whose knowledge is wide but feelings are too narrow! Therefore they have made it a hell of hatred!

One of my brothers, Mr. Wasif, wrote about Zakir Naik’s comments about Sufi saints. According to him Zakir Naik says:
“Sufism is an alien plant in the soil of Islam”

These are actually the words of Allama Mohammad Iqbal (1877-1938) who, no doubt, was an extraordinarily profound and inspiring poet—but as a philosopher, he used to wear several hats of intellect like Herbert Spencer in Western philosophical tradition. Actually, as I think, his poetry and thought begins in trivial metaphors, pretty metaphors, then culminates into “grace metaphors” and finally goes on to profoundest thinking that we have. Mr. Zakir Naik should note that in his profundity—Iqbal himself is a Sufi! For example:

Ik Danish-e-burhani, ik Danish-e-ruhani
Hai Danish-e-burhani hairat ki frawani
(One the one hand there is an argumentative/logical wisdom, and, on the other hand spiritual wisdom! But argumentative/logical wisdom is nothing but surplus of wonder…….)

Qadhe khirad froze keh Frang dad mara
Hama aftab lekin asar-e-sahar na darid
(The shining wine cup of rationality offered by the West is the full Sun but powerless/impotent to bring into being lime light of the morning)

Iqbal used to call himself a disciple (mureed hindi) of Jalal-ud-Din Rumi—the great Persian Sufi poet! Therefore, he was highly impressed by Persian influence on Islamic culture, community and thought. For example, in his famous chapter, The Muslim Community, in The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam, Iqbal writes:
“The conquest of Persia gave to the Musalmans what the conquest of Greece gave to the Romans. But for Persian, our culture would have been absolutely one sided”.

It is doubtless that Mr. Zakir Naik is advocating and pushing exclusively soulless, fanatical and chauvinistic Saudi (Wahhabi) version of Islam that has become a disgusting scar on the face of highly inclusive Islamic teachings! It is duty of Wahabism to wage war against teachings of great Sufi saints who kept the divinely prophet-consciousness alive not by preaching the truth but living like truth! Naik’s grudge towards Hussain (may Allah be pleased with him) is a clear sign that he is an agent of un-Islamic Saudi state employed to save her from Hussain who exposes and challenges Yazid of every age!

Wahhabism is troubled by Sufism for it is a message of inclusiveness and tolerance! Wahhabism wages war against it for it is a message of freedom and core of Islam that is, in its essence anti- hierarchy and anti-establishment! Wahhabism is afraid of Sufism for it shows a beautiful face of Islam but Saudi’s allies (especially United States) are funding her to prove it ugly and dangerous for peaceful coexistence!
Mr. Zakir Naik and all his friends are stakeholders in the highly lucrative and hideous business of a great conspiracy “Defame & Destroy”. For it is duty of Wahhabism to promote blameful and reproachably bigoted religiosity for facilitating its funders to wipe Muslims from the face of the earth by declaring them potentially dangerous creatures!

May Allah save my innocent brothers and sisters in Islam from felling a prey to a vicious alliance! May Allah help us to show our non-Muslim brothers and sisters that Wahhabism is not the real face of Islam! Islam is one of the most inclusive religions wherein “ink of a scholar is holier than blood of a martyr” and “killing one human person is killing humanity”! Islam—that is a religion of heart, love, empathy and compassion!
Amen!

Monday, February 25, 2013

Right To Education Act: Is It Helping In Achieving National Education Mission?

Education is one of the many things that can develop a nation in a big way. Education gives the people of the nation a life to live. Unfortunately, in our country, education has been limited only to those people with a strong economical background. And since, the majority of the nation is lingering in poverty; education for all was not being possible.

Keeping all these points in view, the government had implemented the Right to Education Act to achieve the national education mission.

The Right to Education Act – A brief history
In the year 2005, a rough draft of this bill was composed. But because of its specification to give 25 percent reservation to disadvantaged children, it received huge opposition. As a reply, the drafting committee pressed the point that this provision was a very imperative move to create a democratic as well as educated society.

This education bill was approved by the cabinet in 2009. It received Presidential approval and was notified in the law as ‘The Children’s Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act.’

The insides of the RTE Act

Highlights of the act:

  • This act makes education compulsory to every child between the ages of 6 and 14.
  • Under this act, every private school should reserve 25 percent of the seats to underprivileged and economically backward children.
  • Donations, capitation fees or interviews of the child or the parents are prohibited in the school admissions.
  • And also, those schools that are unrecognized by the government don’t come under this act.

A few facts of the RTE Act:

  • The RTE Act is the first of its kind in the world where it is the government’s responsibility to ensure equal and compulsory education for all. In most other countries like the US and UK, the responsibility of children’s education lies with the parents, and not with the government.
  • When it comes to children under the age of 18 with disabilities, there is a separate education act for them, known as the ‘Persons with Disabilities Act.’
  • There is a special organization called the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights, which is in charge of monitoring and the implementation of the RTE Act.

The RTE Act: Criticism and Analysis
Despite its stature and reputation, the RTE act was subject to many controversies and criticisms too. A few of them are as under.

  • Many educationalists put forth that the act was drafted hastily; just for namesake. It was designed without the consultation of various educational groups. There have also been statements like the quality of education was not taken into consideration while drafting the act.
  • Most of the schools set up in the rural areas were criticized to be corruption-ridden. And also, there were speculations that the teachers in most government schools resorted to absenteeism. The appointments of particular teachers were politically designed.
  • It has also been noted that around 55 percent of urban children attend private schools, and this rate is growing every year by 3 percent. The reason, as most entrepreneurs feel, is that the children are not attending government schools because the teachers don’t show up.
  • Though the act states the admission of children without any certification, there are many schools under this act in various states which don’t follow this sincerely. Most schools insist the children to produce caste and income certificates, and also birth certificates. Because of this, orphans are unable to get admissions into schools. The government was questioned regarding this issue, if any changes were being made, but the government’s reply was just silence.

Various sociologists and educationalists have analysed the RTE Act. And what they have come up with is not at all supportive to the idea of development. Their analysis and statements show clearly the carelessness of the government in the amendments made to the RTE Act. The analysis is as follows:

- Providing quality education is one of the main objectives that come under the RTE Act. Unfortunately, the very education in the government schools is of serious concern. Over the years, the educational standards in government schools have been going down drastically.

- When it comes to the enrolment and admissions, there has been considerable nationwide progress. But, the number of students attending classes in the government schools is falling at the same rate too. One of the findings of the analysts is that in spite of lack of staff in most government schools, teachers remain absent. The attendance of teachers is directly proportionate to the quality of education, which is missing in most of the government schools.

- Despite the large number of enrolments of children, over 50 percent of the students of 5th grade lack the basic knowledge and skills that are expected in a 2nd grade student. Haven’t all these things come under the notice of the government? If yes, doesn’t the RTE act have the power to make the required corrections?

- As already said, the RTE act directs all the schools to reserve 25 percent of seats to the economically backward and underprivileged children. And it is obvious that this will change the classroom structure. Analysis says that the present Indian scene of mixed and diversified classroom is not at all encouraging. The children from the weaker sections of the society are discriminated within the classroom itself, on the basis of caste, creed and ethnicity. Though our Indian constitution prohibits discrimination on various grounds and marks it as a punishable offence, discrimination is still happening in classrooms, as a result of the RTE act.

Education is the basic and a very important right of every Indian citizen. And when more than two-thirds of the nation’s populace doesn’t have access to proper and quality education, we can just see where our nation is heading. We have seen the criticisms and the analysis the RTE act had faced and undergone. The question here is, will this act help in achieving the national education mission, that is, education for all? Will there be a hundred percent literacy rate in our country?

There are many fears regarding the 25 percent seat allotment for the children from the weaker sections. By doing this, the government has justified the poor quality of education in government schools. One more glitch in the RTE act is that will the children who are enrolled in private schools will be able to cope up and adjust with the standards of education culture in elite schools.

To put in a single line, the RTE act is more of a collection of loopholes in regard to quality education and funding, teacher availability and skills and discrimination. And will this act help in achieving national educational mission? Definitely not, if the loopholes remain loopholes. There should be quality education on the government schools also. Teachers should be appointed on merit basis, not politically or on the basis of relation. Strict punishments should be issued for teacher absenteeism. Above all, discrimination on any social basis should be completely abolished. Only after all these things happen, RTE act can really and completely be successful in our country.

Friday, July 26, 2013

Insight: Applying Advanced Analytics In Consumer Firms

By Seema Guha / New Delhi

Consumer-facing companies must be able to gather and manage the right data, apply analytics that generate insights, and translate those insights into effective frontline action. Retailers and consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) companies have long had access to vast amounts of transaction data: every day, companies capture information about every SKU sold to every customer at every store. In addition, companies regularly use sophisticated market-research techniques to answer a variety of questions: what products should we develop and sell? How much is the customer willing to pay? Which products should we discount and when?

Friday, September 27, 2013

'Only 24 Out Of 4,807 Lawmakers Convicted Since 2008'

By Kajol Singh / INN Live

Two days after the Cabinet passed an ordinance allowing convicted and jailed MPs and MLAs to contest elections, it has been revealed that, since 2008, merely 24 out of 4,807 MPs and MLAs have declared in their affidavits of ever being convicted in a court of law.

1,460 or 30 per cent of the MPs and MLAs have declared criminal cases against them of which 688 or 14 per cent have declared serious criminal cases.

Saturday, January 26, 2013

India Shining is Now a Victim Of Its Own Hype

A few years ago, when the Indian growth story had captured the world’s imagination, an Indian friend of mine asked me, “Kishore, is there a danger of too much hype about India?” I replied, somewhat foolishly, “No such danger. Better to have hype than no hype.”

How wrong I was! My Indian friend was wiser. India has become a victim of its own hype. In doing so, it has forgotten some basic points about economic growth. Firstly, economic growth is hard work. It does not come naturally, like the sun rising every day. Secondly, it is often the result of tough and shrewd political leadership. Deng Xiaoping showed his toughness by smashing the communist iron rice bowl that Mao had given to the Chinese people. Zhu Rongji showed his toughness by declaring, “I will prepare 100 coffins. 99 for corrupt officials and one for myself.” As a result of their toughness, China has continued progressing as the fastest growing economy in the world. By contrast, India has had to struggle to introduce foreign investment in retail, a relatively small move to boost the Indian economy.

Hence, India’s economic growth has slowed considerably from 9.55 percent in 2010 to 6.86 percent in 2012. By the rule of 72 (a method for estimating doubling time for an investment), India will now double its economy every 10 years instead of every seven years.

Many would like to believe that this recent slowdown is a temporary stall. This may just represent wishful thinking. Instead, this slowdown may actually be a result of overconfidence that rapid economic growth would come naturally to India, no matter what it does. This overconfidence may have in turn led to disastrous decision-making that has damaged investor confidence. The most damaging decision was the proposed 2012 amendment to tax legislation that foreign investors feared would impose retrospective taxes on mergers and acquisitions dating from 1962.

One wonders what the Indian policymakers were actually thinking when they shot themselves in the foot. Then they asked themselves why the Indian economy had stopped running forward! Similarly, although it has been reversed, the decision to pull back on foreign retail investment showed sheer incompetence in economic management.

How did this incompetence come about? The simple answer is that policymakers began to believe in the hype about India. They assumed that even if India made disastrous economic policy decisions, the Indian economy would be strong and resilient enough to keep growing, no matter what they did. This overconfidence has also infected other members of the Indian establishment. As a result, there is little hard-headed thinking about how the Indian economy can be turned around. Let me stress one point here. There should be absolutely no doubt about the potential of the Indian economy. It remains enormous. What India desperately needs now are three things. First, a clear understanding of the scale of India’s potential. Second, a brutal and dispassionate analysis of the factors blocking India’s realisation of its potential. Third, a list of quick measures it can take to jumpstart rapid economic growth.

First, to understand India’s real potential, all we have to do is to measure the productivity of Indians in the most competitive economy in the world, the US, with the productivity of the Indians in India. This simple calculation will show the gap between India’s potential and India’s current situation. In 2010, per capita income for ethnic Indians in the US was at $37,931 when the national US average was $26,708.

If the Indian population of 1.3 billion could achieve only half of the per capita income of the Indian immigrants in the US, the Indian GDP today would be $24.65 trillion. Sadly, today, India’s GDP is only $1.848 trillion.

Second, given the enormous gap between India’s potential GDP and its actual GDP, the Indian establishment needs to understand what is holding back the potential. Hundreds of books have been written about this subject. There is no shortage of analysis. Instead, there is an abundance of paralysis by analysis. The argumentative Indian, to use Amartya Sen’s phrase, has no shortage of reasons to explain India’s faltering performance.

Given the abundance of analysis, India should stop trying to reinvent the wheel. It should just pick a single credible list of factors that are holding back India’s economic growth. One list that is as good as any other list is the Goldman Sachs paper, “Ten Things for India to Achieve its 2050 Potential”. Since Goldman Sachs was partially responsible for creating the hype by predicting that India would have the second largest economy in the world after China (and ahead of the US) in 2050, the list prepared by the global investment bank is as good as any. The paper suggested 10 things India could do to achieve its 2050 potential: 1. Improve governance, 2. Raise basic educational achievement, 3. Increase quality and quantity of universities, 4. Control inflation, 5. Introduce a credible fiscal policy, 6. Liberalise financial markets, 7. Increase trade with neighbours, 8. Increase agricultural productivity, 9) Improve infrastructure, and 10. Improve environmental quality.

It may take several decades, if not a century or more, for India to achieve progress in the 10 areas that Goldman Sachs has spelled out. What the firm does not point out is the list of all the vested interests that are holding back India’s progress in these 10 areas. Demolishing some of these vested interests will be difficult, especially in a democratic system like India where these interests have entrenched themselves by forging deep partnerships with the electorates that keep them in office. This is why corruption that is legally entrenched in democracies like the US and India is harder to eradicate than illegal corruption.

Therefore, while still trying to work slowly on the long list that Goldman Sachs has provided, India should also focus on a shorter list that could provide a more immediate jumpstart to India’s economy. The first is the easiest thing to do: create a special window for investment and economic participation by overseas Indians. Since the overseas Indians have demonstrated that they are far more economically productive than Indians in India, a window that lets them in quickly would provide an economic benefit through new investment. Equally, if not more importantly, through a process of symbiosis, the productivity, energy and drive of the overseas Indians could have a catalytic effect on the economic and educational performance of Indians in India.

IT IS true that India has already established several schemes to link up overseas Indians with India. For example, India has set up a Person of Indian Origin (PIO) as well as an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) scheme. Even though I hold a PIO card, I don’t know what opportunities it confers apart from visa-free entry to India. At the same time, there are rumours that the PIO and OCI schemes will be merged.

Quite naturally, there is political resistance in India towards providing special privileges to OCIs. This is understandable. However, the Indian government should explain to the people that the economy already benefits enormously from remittances. Indeed, India gets more remittances than any other country in the world, with $70 billion coming in from overseas in 2012. Yet, India can benefit far more from its overseas population if it uses them as a source of ideas as much as dollars. New ideas for improving the Indian economy can do far more good than dollars to supplement monthly incomes.

The second quick thing that India can do to jumpstart the economy is to become a leading votary of open globalisation. The success of the overseas Indian, especially in the US, has demonstrated competition is good for Indians. Indeed, they succeed and thrive when there is open global competition, performing as well if not better than any other nationality. The record of India’s economic performance also shows clearly that India’s economy grew slowly when it was relatively closed and grew faster after the then finance minister Manmohan Singh opened it up from 1991.

Given this clear evidence, the rest of the world should, in theory, fear economic competition from Indians. Ironically, the situation is the reverse. Indians worry more about global competition from the rest even though they have outperformed the rest when there is level global competition. How does one explain this manifestly absurd situation? The simple answer is that many Indian policymakers still lack cultural confidence. Their policymaking mindsets still come from the 1960s and ’70s when there was a remarkable unanimity of opinion that the opening up of the economy would lead to defenceless India being ravaged by avaricious western MNCs. Instead, it is now clear that the opposite would have happened. Any opening up to global competition would have made the Indians in India as productive as the overseas Indians as Indians thrive under global competition. Just by ditching the old mindsets of the ’60s, Indian policy policymakers could make a huge difference. By adopting a bias towards openness in their daily decision-making, they would give a huge and immediate boost to the Indian economy.

The third quick thing that India can do is to seize geopolitical opportunities. After almost two decades of deft diplomacy, China has surprisingly begun to make mistakes in its relations with its neighbours, especially Japan. Over time, China will definitely learn and recover from its mistakes. In the meantime, however, Japan will begin hedging its bets by investing less in China and more elsewhere. Indeed, Japan has been the largest single investor in China, after Hong Kong and Taiwan. The total amount of Japanese investment in China is $12.6 billion, while that in India is $2.3 billion. Just imagine how the Indian economy would look if these figures were reversed.

At the same time, there are other low-lying economic fruits that India could pluck. India already has Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with Japan and ASEAN. And ASEAN and Japan also have an FTA. India could show its diplomatic deftness by converting those three existing bilateral FTAs into a trilateral FTA and jumpstart a new trend of trilateral FTAs. Indian policymakers have been reluctant to do this because they fear India cannot compete with both Japan and ASEAN. Ironically, it is ASEAN and Japan who should fear Indian competitiveness. This is why the mindsets of the Indian policymakers have to change immediately.

In short, even though the Indian economy appears to be slowing down and losing its edge, a few easy things can be done to rev it up again. All it takes is a little more cultural confidence and some shrewd and tough decision-making by the policymakers. What India needs now is a little less hype and a little more quiet shrewdness. And, it can be done.

Monday, July 27, 2009

How To Write A Comprehensive Public Relations Plan?

By M H Ahssan


The public relations plan is one of the most important documents you will produce in your career.

It has been said that public relations is the result of form and substance. While this is not exactly true, it does have some basis when you're trying to persuade your client or boss to let you spend their money. How you say it (form) and what you say (substance) will likely determine your success or failure in getting your proposal accepted.

Let's face it, clients and bosses are impressed by the way things look -- just like you, they're only human. All other things being equal, a well-organized and attractively prepared proposal will win out every time. (For the purposes of this document, the term "client" will be used from now on. You may substitute "boss" if your situation dictates it.)

So, what can you do to help ensure success? Well, there are a number of elements in an effective public relations proposal presentation of which you must be aware. Begin each section with the appropriate subheads:

Letter of transmittal
Executive summary
Situation analysis
Problem and consequences
Campaign goal
Audience identification and messages
Audience objectives
Strategies
Communication Tactics
Schedule
Budget
Evaluation plans
Pertinent research
Communication samples
Each of these elements is vital. Each plays an important role in building a logical, well-planned proposal. A detailed discussion of each follows.

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
This item is an adjunct to -- and precedes -- the actual plan. As simple as it may sound, you need to transmit your plan to the client or your boss. Standard accepted business practice dictates that you write a letter or memorandum of transmittal. Limit the transmittal letter/memo to a single page.

If you are submitting the plan to a client, use the following format:

A cordial opening paragraph stating that you are submitting "the attached plan for XXX campaign, as promised." Follow this with a brief description of the plan, including the campaign's "bottom line" -- income expectations, expenses, net "profit" or loss -- in other words, what your client is expected to lay out for the public relations campaign.
A reference to the executive summary that follows.
A statement that you either look forward to presenting the plan in person as a previously designated time and place, or will contact the client to arrange a meeting to discuss the plan.
Gracious words of "thank you" for the opportunity to submit the plan.
Two caveats: Spell the company's and client's names correctly, and double-check titles and addresses. You don't want two strikes against you before the client gets to the meat of your proposal.

If you are submitting the plan to your boss, make sure to economize even further on your words. You can eliminate some of the opening and closing niceties.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Also an adjunct to the plan, this is a summary of your proposed campaign that covers several key points most likely to interest the executive who reads your plan. Here is a suggested format:

Executive Summary
The Problem: State here what you believe the problem to be.
Program Goal: State here what your ultimate goal is.
Target Audiences: (1) Your primary audience, (2) your secondary (intervening) audience(s), and (3) your tertiary (special) audience(s).
Audience Objectives: (1) What you expect your primary audience to do, (2) what you expect your intervening audience(s) to do, and (3) what you expect your special audience(s) to do.
Major Strategy: State your major strategy here, listing the key tactics that you will use in your campaign.

Recommended Budget: State your total anticipated income and sources, your anticipated expenses, and the anticipated net profit or loss.
Evaluation Plans: State how you expect to evaluate (and expect to know) whether or not you've achieved each of your campaign and audience objectives.

SITUATION ANALYSIS
The very first item in the plan itself should be an analysis of the current situation, based on results of your research. The situation analysis contains all of the information and data you collected about the internal and external environments.

Depending on how much research is required and has been conducted, and how complicated and/or involved the organization's problems are, the situation analysis can run from one to three or more pages.

While a problem statement directs the planning effort to a particular set of conditions, the situation analysis provides details about internal and external contexts. It includes a literature review (which requires a bibliography of sources).

Use the following outline as a guide to writing the situation analysis:

The Situation Analysis: Information To Look For

INTERNAL FACTORS
Statements of the organization's mission, charter, bylaws, history and structure.
Lists, biographical sketches and photos of key individuals -— officers, board members, and program managers.
Detailed descriptions of programs, products, services, etc.
Statistics about resources, budget, staffing and programs.
Summaries of interviews with key personnel about the problem situation.
Copies of policy statements and procedures related to the problem.
Complete descriptions of how the organization currently handles the problem.
Lists and descriptions of the organization's controlled communication media.

EXTERNAL FACTORS
Clippings from newspapers, magazines, trade publications, and newsletters tracing print media coverage of organization and problem situation.
Reports of radio, television and cable placements.
Content analyses of media coverage.
Lists of media, journalists, columnists, and free-lance writers who report news about the organization and related issues.
Lists and descriptions of individuals and groups that share the organization's concerns, interests, and views (including their controlled print and broadcast media).
Lists and descriptions of individuals and groups that oppose the organization's positions on the issues (including their controlled print and broadcast media).
Survey results of public's awareness, knowledge, opinions, and behaviors related to the organization and problem situation.
Schedules of special events, observances, and other important dates related to the organization and problem.
Lists of government agencies, legislators, and officials with regulatory or legislative power affecting the organization and the problem situation.
Copies of relevant government regulations, legislation, bills pending, referenda, publications, and hearing reports.
Copies of published research on topics related to the problem situation.
Lists of important reference books, records, and directories, as well as their locations in the organization.
When you write the situation analysis, present your research findings in a logical and easily understood order. List results of client research, situational research, and audience research. If you have used the suggested outline above, you should have all of the necessary pertinent information you need.

ASSUMPTIONS
No matter how much research you've done, something always seems to be missing. If you've done your homework well, you should have no assumptions to present here.

In some cases, however, assumptions are inevitable and as a practical matter, unavoidable. So, when you write your situation analysis, you may need to make some assumptions about various aspects of the situation. If you must make assumptions, list them in a supplemental section, noting what missing information you can reasonably assume.

"A friendly media" is not a valid assumption. Professionals never make assumptions, especially about the news media.

PROBLEM & CONSEQUENCES
Based on your research, and particularly on your preliminary interviews with the client, you should be able to isolate the overriding problem, and determine what will happen if the problem is not solved.

The problem statement itself should be concise and very specific. If possible, write it in 25 words or less, using standard subject-verb-object order.

This step is crucial to your plan and to the success of your campaign. Mess up here and you will end up 'way off course. Think of the problem statement as your starting course to the moon. One degree to the left or right, up or down, and you'll miss the moon by thousands of miles.

It's the same with the problem statement. Identify the wrong problems, and you may as well not even turn in your plan.

Get to the root cause of your problem, and try to identify exactly what attitude (what they think) or behavior (what they do) you need to influence.

Do you want attitudes crystallized, modified or reinforced? Be especially conscious of the ultimate behavior you want to evoke. Answer this question: "What exactly is it that we want them to do as a result of this campaign?"

And yet, proper problem identification and statement is still not enough. The client may recognize that there is a problem, but unless there is a consequence —- unless the client will lose something of value, whether it be profits, members, or quality of service -- the client may remain unconvinced about your plan.

You must show the client what could result if something isn't done to correct the problem identified above. Explain in one concise declarative sentence what the consequences will be.

CAMPAIGN GOAL
This is not a particularly difficult section to complete. But first, here's a brief review of goals and objectives.

Goals are general directions, somewhat nebulous, that are not specific enough to be measured. Think of the word "go." It has no end.

A good example is the signature line of the Star Trek television series: "To boldly go where no man ("no one" in Generations) has gone before." You can't measure it, and you probably will never know if the goals were accomplished, because once humans have gone somewhere, we've been there, and there are still other places to go since the universe is infinite and has no end.

Objectives, on the other hand, are specific and measurable. They can be output objectives, or they can be attitudinal or behavioral. But most of all, they can be measured. They are concise. They are specific. Think of the word "object." You can touch it, it's there, it's actual, it's finite.

Back to the goal. State your campaign goal simply and resolutely. State it confidently, with all the bravado you can muster, secure in the knowledge that the question, "Did you accomplish your goal?" can never be answered.

AUDIENCE IDENTIFICATION & MESSAGES
Audience identification is vital to your campaign. You need to talk to the right people. You need to conserve valuable funds, time and manpower, and you cannot do this unless you target your publics carefully.

A word about publics, stakeholders and audiences: A "public" is a group of people with similar interests. "Stakeholders" are a special kind of public, composed of people who have a particular interest (or "stake") in your organization. An "audience" is a public with whom you are communicating.

You need to find some intelligent answers to some equally intelligent questions.

Who exactly is going to be affected by your public relations campaign? Who exactly are you trying to persuade?
You're going to need some cooperation from others; who will this be? Where are these people located? How can you find them? How can you get in touch with them?
The people you want to reach listen to opinion leaders; exactly who are these opinion leaders? Who and where are those credible, authoritative sources that your intended audience believes, and who can help you get your messages across?
Your audiences generally act the way you do -— they do the same things you do. What magazines and newspapers do they read? What radio stations do they tune in to? What TV shows do they watch? To what clubs and organizations do they belong? What professional associations do they join? What are their favorite charities? What are their children's favorite participation sports?
So how to you reach them? Find out. Do your research.

Generally speaking, there are three types of audiences:

PRIMARY: This is the audience or public that you specifically want to influence. It's the people whose behavior you're trying to change. Influence them, and you've done your job well.
SECONDARY: These are "intervening" audiences. These are people who can intervene on your behalf and influence the primary audience. Convince them that you're right, and they can help you get to the primary audience. You've heard of "third-party testimonials" that are more credible than your direct communication? Secondary audiences are those "third-party" people. Influence the secondary audiences and your job will become a bit easier. Their "endorsement" of your cause serves as their "testimonial."
TERTIARY: (Pronounced "ter-she-arry") These are "special" publics composed primarily of organized groups (e.g., clubs, councils, associations) that can mobilize quickly and endorse your cause. They usually have an established means of communication with their membership via newsletters and other media.
In your plan, identify who these people are, then prioritize them. Like the "inverted-pyramid" style of journalistic writing, audience prioritization will allow you to eliminate potential audiences from the bottom-up should the need arise because of budget cuts, time constraints or manpower reductions.

Once you've identified and prioritized your audiences in your plan, tell the client exactly what message you believe should be directed to each of the audiences you have selected.

Like the problem statement, your messages should be direct and declaratory, and they should articulate specific benefits to the audiences. Try out a number of messages, then settle on one per audience, selecting the one you consider most important to your campaign goal.

AUDIENCE OBJECTIVES
In this section, state exactly what your objectives are for each audiences you identified in the previous section. In general, there must be at least one objective per audience. This is usually sufficient. In come cases, however, you will have more than one objective for each audience.

Objectives should measure impact. Behavioral objectives are preferred ("Exactly what is it you want to get them to do?"), but the objectives can also be attitudinal ("What do you want them to think?"), or informational ("What do you want them to know that they didn't know before?").

Objectives also can measure your output -- what you did. But unless output is central to your problem and contributes to solutions, try to keep these to a minimum.

State your objectives in specific and quantifiable (measurable) terms whenever possible. Set them in a time frame, and if you know what the budget is, tell the client what you expect the cost to be. The objectives should be reachable, they should be acceptable to the client, and they must be ethical.

A crystal-clear objective would read something like this: "Our objective is to deliver X results by Y date at a cost of Z dollars."

Think of the goals as the treasure at the top of a stairway, and the objectives as the stairs.

STRATEGIES
In this section, you need to present a number of strategies, each of which will in itself solve the problem. This is one of the hardest sections to complete, especially for inexperienced practitioners who must rely on information provided by others, rather than on personal experience. However, it is so essential to the campaign's success that every effort must be made to present excellent strategic alternatives.

There are four basic strategies:

Do nothing (inactive).
Do something only if necessary (reactive).
Do something before a problem arises (proactive).
Involve others in solving or heading off problems (interactive).
It may also be feasible to take a "multi-active" approach to solving the problem, in which case you would use elements from each basic type of strategy.

Whatever strategy is finally selected, know that it will help determine the success or failure of your proposed program. You may find it easier to select a strategy after reviewing the list of public relations initiatives (tactics, activities) that you will develop after conducting a number of creative brainstorming sessions.

Do not -- repeat, do not -- use the terms "inactive,""reactive," "proactive," "interactive," or "multi-active" in your plan, unless the client fully understands the terms and initiates their usage. The words can be considered public relations jargon and often are meaningless to the client. Don't use these words as crutches in an attempt to avoid explaining your strategy in detail.

State that each strategy, when considered on its own merits independently of the other alternative strategies, is a viable option to be judged on its own strengths, and will definitely solve the problem. Eliminate any approach you believe will not solve the problem on its own. If a combination of approaches can solve the problem, list the combination as a strategic alternative.

Each alternative strategy will attain all of the objectives listed earlier. Again, each individual solution must be feasible, appropriate and acceptable. All possible solutions should be considered and presented -- unless, of course, your particular problem is one of those rare cases that has but a single solution. No, strike that notion. Don't be tempted by this intriguing possibility. Assume that your problem has two or more solutions.

Discuss all of the pros and cons of each strategy considered.

In doing so, try to offer options to the client. If you can identify business risks and opportunities, you give the client an opportunity to exercise informed judgement. Clients need viable options -- they need to know each option's advantages and disadvantages -- in order to make decisions based on fact instead of emotion.

Clients don't want to "shoot from the hip." They want to make rational decisions.

Remember, you must take careful aim in everything you do in public relations. Don't shoot from the hip: you could end up with powder burns on your butt.)

Finally, tell the client what your recommended approach or strategy is. Be sure to tell the client why you recommend this particular strategy, and be prepared to defend your choice under withering fire and challenge from the client. You can't fake this part. It may be helpful to refer to the pros and cons you listed for each strategic alternative.

COMMUNICATION TACTICS
This is the section in which you tell the client exactly what communications initiatives you propose. If you have conducted some creative brainstorming, you should have developed a "shopping list" of possible tactics that will achieve your previously stated objectives.

Look at each tactic from the standpoint of what it will do to achieve your objectives.

Your tactics will include:


ACTION EVENTS: Non-written tactics such as special events, demonstrations, exhibits, parades, community contributions (manpower, talent, advice, money) and other non-verbal activities. Separate your action events into message tactics (which will be used to get your message across to the audience) and media tactics (how you will utilize the news media to publicize your action events).


COMMUNICATIONS TACTICS: Verbal tactics (oral and written) that use words or pictures. These include newsletters, flyers, news releases, brochures, direct mail, advertising, themes, slogans, the World Wide Web (WWW), and other initiatives that use words and language as their basis. As with your action events, separate communications initiatives into message tactics (which will be used to get your message directly to the audience), and media tactics (how you will utilize the news media to communicate your messages).

When presenting your tactics in this section, be sure to provide a brief one- to three-paragraph description of each tactic, especially noting the audiences to which the tactic is directed, the message you expect the audience to receive, your reasons for selecting this particular tactic (cite your research, focus group results, etc.), and the anticipated results.

SCHEDULE
You must show that you have thought through the plan to the smallest details. In this section, present your planning calendar. Be specific and comprehensive. Include specific dates whenever possible.

Tell the client exactly when you're going to conduct the action events and communication tactics you noted earlier. Also, tell the client who will be doing the work.

List milestones and deadlines for each of the events and tactics. Plan writers always note when communication products and activities will culminate, but often forget milestones and deadlines.

For example, don't just say that a brochure will be delivered to the office on July 17. You must also include milestones and deadlines, and let the client know that initial copy drafts are due on May 2, that three days are required for initial editing, that second drafts are due on May 10, that two more days are required for editing, that the final draft is due on May 17, and that final copy approval is due on May 19.

The client also must know that final copy is due at the typesetter on May 21, that the graphic designer needs two weeks to work on the design, that the printer needs the camera-ready art and layout by July 1, and that a minimum of 10 days is required before the printed brochure can be placed on the client's desk.

Each of the dates above should be included in your schedule. Do this for each initiative. You may either present a separate calendar for each tactic, or combine them into a comprehensive timetable. Ideally, you should do both.

Don't forget to correlate once again the events with the audiences you expect to address, and what you expect to accomplish.

Finally, don't forget to include any research you will be conducting, as well as on-going and end-of-project evaluation dates.

BUDGET
An axiom: It is not easy to compile a budget.

Putting a budget together is especially difficult when you are working on a hypothetical case, or if you are not sure of the client's requirements ("Why don't you present three scenarios -- minimal, moderate and optimal -- and we'll pick the one we can afford").

This may seem incredible, but the client often has absolutely no idea how much is available for your campaign. More often than we suspect, the client may simply be "fishing" for a cheap way to obtain some publicity for the company. Or, the client may want to know how much a pet project would cost if it were done correctly.

That said, you must have a budget section. You must have an accurate representation of how much things are going to cost. The information may be close at hand (e.g., previous experience, other plans, informative co-workers), or ... you may have to make a lot of phone calls.

Separate your anticipated income from your proposed expenses, and present both totals. Finally, give the client a bottom-line figure. Tell the client exactly what the campaign is going to cost. An excess of income over expenses will result in a profit to the client; an excess of expenses over income will result in a cash outlay by the client.

Now . . . don't you wish you had taken accounting in college?

EVALUATION PLANS
If you have planned your campaign correctly, your communication and action tactics will have been performed according to schedule, and will have cost exactly (or pretty close to) what you said they would cost. You will have reached all of your identified audiences and persuaded them to do exactly what you wanted them to do.

You would have attained all of your objectives, which ultimately means that you have achieved your primary goal. And, if it is not too bold to say, you will have solved the client's public relations problem, and those dire consequences you predicted earlier will not come to pass.

But how do you know whether or not you've succeeded? You must measure your accomplishments. How do you measure those results?

You do it by measuring two phases of your campaign:


IMPACT: Ask yourself what behavioral or attitudinal changes the campaign effected. Impact measurement documents the extent to which you achieved the outcomes spelled out in your objectives for each target public. It also tells you to what extent your overall program goal was achieved.


OUTPUT (or implementation): In other words, what did you DO? How much effort went into carrying out the campaign? How many publications and releases were prepared and distributed? How many column inches and minutes of air-time coverage did you get? How many people were exposed to your message?

Emphasize impact -- impact is paramount. Emphasize output only if the communications "products" are central to your problem and contribute to solutions.

Tell the client exactly how you are going to measure the results of what you did, and how they relate to your objectives.

Remember, you cannot evaluate effectively unless you have good objectives. If you don't have good objectives, then you have nothing to measure against.

PERTINENT RESEARCH
Create a "Tab A" and submit your research results. In this section, include client, situational, and audience research results (clippings, polls, interviews, library research, or summaries of research found elsewhere -- with appropriate source identification). Include anything you deemed essential while compiling your situation analysis.

COMMUNICATION SAMPLES
Create a "Tab B" and include descriptions and/or rough layouts of recommended communications materials (i.e., news releases, public service announcements, speech outlines, statements, institutional ads, brochure dummies).

For each news release, list names of news organizations to which they will be delivered, and their deadlines. Be sure to use a wide variety of communication channels and methods, properly timed and coordinated.

Remember also that actions and events generally are more effective than written or oral communications alone. You should strive to keep verbal communications to a minimum, and make imaginative and creative actions and events a key part of your campaign.

A LAST WORD
Finally . . .

No typos. Bind all work neatly. Personalize the transmittal letters if you know the names of the selection committee members. No typos. Use a computer and laser printer. Meet deadlines. Use an easily readable font typeface (minimum 12-point font). Use good paper, don't skimp.

Remember: The "class" projected by your proposal is reflected in the perception that the client has on your "excellence" as a public relations professional.

Look professional, and you will be viewed as professional.

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Fresh 'Red Meat' Will Lowers Diabetes And Heart Disease

There are people in this country eating too much red meat. They should cut back. There are people eating too many carbs. They should cut back on those. There are also people eating too much fat, and the same advice applies to them, too.

What’s getting harder to justify, though, is a focus on any one nutrient as a culprit for everyone. I’ve written Upshot articles on how the strong warnings against salt and cholesterol are not well supported by evidence.

Saturday, February 16, 2013

Myopia, Distortions and Blind Spots in the Vision Document of AAP

The Vision Document of the Aam Aadmi Party offers a simplistic understanding of the issues confronting Indian society, and confuses and confl ates symptoms with the disease.

The Vision Document of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)1 springs no surprises. It puts down in black and white what its main protagonists have been saying for the last two years. It contains the same unthinking hyperbole, self-righteous condescension, superficial reasoning, loud sloganeering and a good deal of reactionary politics that is sought to be smuggled under a veneer of sympathy for the aam aadmi.

It must be said to the credit of the authors that for once they have acknowledged that there is something like the Constitution of India whose preamble they have quoted with approval. But that should not mislead one into believing that they uphold the basics of the parliamentary democracy or democracy per se. Otherwise they would not have blatantly asserted in the very first section of the document: Hum satta ke kendroko dhvast karke rajnaitik satta seedhe janata ke hathme dene ja rahe hai (After destroying the centres of authority, we are going to hand over power directly to the people). Surely they are aware that the Parliament of India is a supreme centre of political authority under the Constitution. The authors of the document seem to be oblivious of a queer mixture of anarchism and Bonapartism that characterises their statement.

Simplistic Analysis
Their analysis of non-fulfilment of the vision of the preamble of our Constitution is simplistic and misleading. All the evils and shortcomings are attributed to the wholesale inheritance of “colonial laws and structures” by the indigenous rulers who, according to them, have simply substituted the erstwhile foreign exploiters. Leaving aside the half-truth of such a statement, what are the laws and structures that the authors are speaking about? They are concentrating exclusively on non-participatory and indirect features of our legislative and executive structures. It is one thing to argue in favour of more directly representative and participatory structures. It is entirely different to ascribe the “exploitative character” of the system to such features, which is what the authors do. They recommend more participatory legislative and executive structures through a more effective role to the gram sabha, greater accountability of the executives to the people whom they are appointed to serve, introduction of “referendums” and “initiatives” in the legislative process and “recall” of elected representatives. And the appointment of a Lokpal to oversee the executive and root out corruption. This is all fine. There has been a good deal of debate at the popular as well as the expert levels on these issues. This is not the place to enter into a debate on these specific suggestions. Suffice it to say that it is naĂŻve to assume that the exploitative character of the economic system will simply vanish with the introduction of such administrative and legislative devices. Even more naĂŻve is the supposition that the exploitative forces which form the bedrock of the system would not subvert the proposed more representative and participatory devices and simply allow a truly people-centric transformation of the economic system.

But the Vision Document is scrupulously silent on the core issue of the exploitative base of the system. It shies away from suggesting any measures intended to bring about a people-centric transformation of the economic system. Such silence is a blind spot of the Vision Document.

Neglect of Root of Problems
The Vision Document confuses and conflates symptoms with the disease. It talks of a growing divide between the rich and the poor, of the loot of natural resources by big business and politicians, of unemployment, of inflation, and, of course, corruption. Nowhere does it go to the root of the problem which lies in the adoption of the neo-liberal policies by the ruling classes, which include not only the ruling and the main opposition conglomerates of the political parties and big capital (indigenous as well as foreign), but also the affluent and better-off layers of the recently emerged middle class which has benefited from the neo-liberal policies, be they in IT and IT-related sectors, financial services, advertising and marketing, print and electronic media, land and real estate. (These sectors cater to the conspicuous consumption of the neo-rich and their imitators, or the praetorian guard of the higher echelons of the ruling classes.) Is it that a sizeable section of the followers of AAP belong to this section of our society and, therefore, the vision informing the document gets distorted and blurred?

The AAP document looks at the contemporary symptoms. It refuses to see the current situation as a part of a historical process which started long ago. Its concern is short term. Its focus is myopic. And it stops short of any radical analysis or measure.

Take, for example, its position on the issue of reservation for dalits, scheduled tribes and the Other Backward Classes. It is oblivious of the fact that the Constitution recognised special measures such as reservation in the context of longstanding social injustice to which some sections of our society were subjected. The criterion of long-standing social injustice cannot be bracketed with what is loosely described as “economic backwardness” which the document does. Such bracketing has been often the handle used by the opponents of reservations. The Vision Document has adopted this stance. The document also talks about denial of reservation on attainment of economic advance by the beneficiary. The concept of the creamy layer has been part of the reservation system right from the beginning. Why is it that the document repeats this as a new discovery and propounds exclusion on the specious ground that there are some who have somewhat benefited by reservations? Such facile arguments have been used again and again by the “upper” caste opponents of reservation and the document finds itself in agreement with that view. The fact of the matter is that the AAP has openly stood against the concept of reservation for promotions. All in all, it is not difficult to see through the lip service paid by the document to the cause of social justice and realise where the sympathies of the authors lie.

Or look at what the document has to say about education and health. It is not really worried about progressive commoditisation of health and education. The solution it proposes is that the standard of the schools run by municipalities and governments should be brought up to the level of the expensive, privately-run schools. Nowhere has such a dual system and commercialisation of basic human rights led to an upgradation of the worse-off section, which constitutes the major part of service provision. What is necessary is an immediate halt to commoditisation, large-scale expansion of public health services and compulsory institution of a common neighbourhood school system. Such demands have been in the public domain and there are powerful movements supporting them. Why is it that they are not visible to the Vision Document? Is this too due to the class bias of the AAP?

There is a brief paragraph in the Vision Document about the communal issue. It is worded in such a “goody goody” fashion that it ceases to have much meaning in the real political context. All that it says is that one should respect religious diversity and religion should not be turned into a political instrument. This is like apple pie and mother’s milk. The real issue today is that the minority, particularly the Muslim minority, has been largely alienated because of the overt or covert politics of the major political formations. Democratic freedoms and rights of the minority youth, in particular, are being suppressed ruthlessly. In the name of anti-terror action, innocent people are being targeted, tortured and incarcerated for long years. Islamophobia which is part of the US-Israel imperialist strategy has had an unacknowledged impact on our domestic politics as well. Such a situation cannot be remedied by resorting to wishy-washy statements. Because of its reluctance to go beyond the superficial and the obvious, the Vision Document suffers from inexcusable shallowness.

Similarly on the question of the large-scale, ruthless uprooting of adivasis from their land, livelihood and habitat, their fierce resistance to the process and the virtual war proclaimed by the Indian state against them in the name of defending the country against the so-called “security threat number one”, there is hardly anything except the indirect observation that acquisition of mineral and forestlands must have the consent of the local people.

On the Agrarian Question
On the agrarian question, the approach of the Vision Document boils down to two issues, quite important in themselves but again more symptomatic than basic. In essence, it says that land should not be acquired except with the consent of the gram sabha and that farmers should get a fair price which should be 150% of the production cost. Now, land acquisition is only a subset of the bigger set of the land question. One cannot find a solution to the subset without talking about the bigger set. And the gram sabha consent, whether in regard to forest, land, or environment has been manipulated any number of times, despite some apparently good legal provisions to that effect. Moreover, the market has deprived the peasantry of its land on a scale many, many times more than the land acquisition process propelled by governments. Has the document anything to say about this inexorable onslaught of the market? About the fair and remunerative price to farmers there cannot be two opinions. But how does one ensure it in a market that is being integrated with the global agriculture market? More important, do not the authors of the Vision Document know that a very small proportion of our peasantry produces marketable surplus? And that 92% of our peasantry consists of small and marginal peasants for whom farming is largely subsistence farming and clearly an unviable proposition? There are no easy solutions to the land question. In the ultimate analysis, “The question of land is the question of capital”. And one cannot find piecemeal, symptomatic, tokenistic solutions. The question of land or the agrarian question in India today calls for nothing short of a complete overhaul of the mode of production. But this obviously is another blind spot in their vision.

On the question of unemployment, all that the document envisions is a transparent, merit-based appointment to public service posts, provision of bank finance for self-employment in small businesses and, believe it or not, placing the responsibility of finding jobs for the unemployed on the gram panchayats! The jobless growth path that neo-liberal economics prescribes will not get wished away by the simplistic measures suggested in the document. And the growth model based largely on integration with the world economy and larger and larger inflows of capital, footloose or otherwise, is itself facing the prospect of failure. Unless there is a more thorough analysis and willingness to adopt radical measures, there is no possibility of the unemployment problem being tackled successfully. But such thinking is beyond the vision of the document.

A glaring shortcoming of the document is its parochial vision. The vision literally confines itself to a narrow and shallow focus. It speaks of the problems of the Indian polity as if India exists in a self-contained world of its own. Nothing seems to be of concern, if it lies apparently beyond the borders. Indeed it even shies away from many real problems of our own people residing in border states/areas. It is as if not only is there no world outside our borders, but our border areas and people too do not exist.

First, the question of border areas and people. On Kashmir, there is absolutely nothing in the Vision Document. Perhaps, the articulation of an honest but unpalatable position on this issue by a leading protagonist of AAP (known for his courage of conviction) and the quick, violent reaction it generated in the jingoistic, far right circles and the chauvinistic, adverse comments it faced even within the core of the erstwhile India Against Corruption parivar may have something to do with this silence. Perhaps, the crusade against corruption and the installation of participative and direct democracy in the rest of India is far more important to the AAP than the plight of the Kashmiri people. Whatever may be the reason, the parochial character of the Vision Document is difficult to conceal.

In the same vein, the document has little to say about the neo-imperialism of the US-Israel combine, its aggression threatening our borders, the turmoil in the whole of west Asia, and new experiments in more democratic politics being tried in the whole of Latin America. This is not to say that another chapter needs to be added to the document in due course. What is astonishing is that a political party hoping to take the reins of power is mute on the global processes, particularly those advancing the tentacles of neo-imperialism, which are inextricably influencing our politics and our society. Is it just a parochial vision or is it silent endorsement of those processes, which are welcome to the class base of the AAP?

With such complete silence on the basics, the compensation is found in excessive articulation of the trivial. How else can one explain an entire three pages of the 20-page document being devoted to spelling out how the party propaganda will be carried out, how the candidates for elections will be chosen, and how the elected members of the party will live or travel and such like details?

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Forget Fingerprints, Crimes Will Be Solved By Body Shape

Grainy CCTV footage in which a criminal’s face is obscured can make it difficult to identify perpetrators, and this job is even harder if no fingerprints are left at the scene.

But, in what’s been dubbed a biometric breakthrough, researchers have discovered that a person’s body shape could equally give them away.

Using just eight measurements, forensic teams were able to correctly identify people - even through clothes.

Dubbed ‘body recognition’, the technique was developed at the University of Adelaide, and is said to be comparable with facial and fingerprint analysis.

Friday, July 22, 2016

The Big Question: Do Women’s Periods Really Synchronise When They Spend Time Together?

By ANNIE SADAF | INNLIVE

Research in the 1970s had indicated that being in close proximity led to the transfer of pheromones.

It is a popular belief that women who live together synchronise their menstrual cycles, and that it’s mediated by their pheromones – the airborne molecules that enable members of the same species to communicate non-verbally.

Thursday, March 12, 2015

How Do You Publish 'Sponsored Content' For Your Brand?

Sponsored articles are one of the new shiny new objects in the content marketing world. This new advertising channel has opened the doors for brands to become part of everyday conversations with consumers on the platforms they trust most for news, education, and entertainment -- media outlets.

Sitting at the intersection of editorial thought leadership and native advertising, sponsored articles have only recently risen to prominence as a tactic worthy of garnering a share of marketing budgets.

Tuesday, March 04, 2014

Satyamev Jayate-2 Impact: Health Ministry Scrapped '2-Finger Test' On Rape Victims, Dubs As 'Unscientific'

By Sayani Mishra | INNLIVE

After Bollywood actor Aamir Khan's shocking revelations regarding the dealing of rape cases in the first episode of the second part of his TV show 'Satyamev Jayate', the Union Health Ministry, which has drawn new guidelines for treating rape survivors, has asked all hospitals to set up a designated room for forensic and medical examination of victims besides outlawing the two-finger test performed on them, dubbing it as unscientific.

The Department of Health Research (DHR) along with Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) with the help of experts formulated this set of national guidelines for dealing with criminal assault cases, which will hopefully put an end to the "horrendous" medical process, which the victims are subjected to after the sexual abuse.