By Likha Veer | INNLIVE
The Article 356 of the Constitution of Republic of India deals with President's Rule which denotes the failure of the Constitutional mechanism of an Indian state.
In the event of President’s Rule which is caused due to the government’s failure in a state to function as per the Constitutional norms, the state comes under the direct control of the central government, with decision-making authority exercised through the Governor instead of a Council of Ministers headed by an elected Chief Minister accountable to the state legislature.
If there has been failure of the constitutional machinery, Article 356 is put into practice. During the President’s rule, the sole authority lies with the governor of the state. He may wisely utilize the services of retired civil servants or other administrators for assisting him. Such nominees will perform the same roles of council of ministers in the state cabinet.
President's rule can be imposed under different circumstances as follows:
- Uncertainty of electing the Chief Minister
- Revoking of support by a supporting party
- Greater delay in holding the elections
- Loss of no confidence motion
- To nominate the new Chief Minister
- To order for the president’s rule
If the President’s rule is imposed in the state, it will be the third time for such an imposition in the state (Considering erstwhile Andhra state also) . At earlier instances, for the first time due to the loss of majority, the President’s rule was imposed on 15 Nov 1954 and it last up to 29 March 1955. In the second instance, it was during the Jai Andhra agitation, President’s rule was imposed from 11 Jan 1973 to 10 Dec 1973.
No comments:
Post a Comment